Reflection on 'Home Fire': Fathers and Sons as a Theme
A strong theme reflected throughout 'Home Fire' is the relationship between fathers and sons. In particular, the story focuses in on two different father-son relationships. The first is the relationship between Eamonn and his father, Karamat Lone and the second relationship portrayed is Parvaiz's relationship and remembrance of his dead father. After reading the book, I've come to the conclusion that the book is speaking to how sons can often feel trapped in their father's shadow, especially when the father has carved a very distinct personality and identity of his own. Sons often face pressure to be like their dad, and this book definitely portrays this with Eamonn's initial admiration of his father and Parvaiz's obsession of his. The book comes to the realization that sons sometimes have to separate themselves from their father's legacies in order to be able to truly live and have their own identity. This growing evolution of the sons' characters from seeking closeness to their fathers to breaking away, is clearly highlighted from start to end.
Firstly, there's Eamonn, who feels trapped by his father's name in politics. He starts out seeking closeness from his father, all while feeling disillusioned that he will not be able to live up to his father's success. The transition to Eamonn becoming his own person is marked when he defies his father by detaching himself from his family name and deciding to post a video online that supports Aneeka.
The trend I noticed with Parvaiz has different circumstances. Parvaiz is at first very curious about his father and seeks someone he can look up to since he has lacked a fatherly figure in his life. When he is told stories about his dad and starts feeling connected to him, he decides to follow his father's footsteps and become a terrorist. However, once fully "indoctrinated" Parvaiz realizes his mistake and that he no longer aspires to be like his father, who he has discovered was a cruel and unloving person who never cared about his family.
I think this theme of father and sons is a very interesting thematic sequence to note in 'Home Fire' because of all the tensions and details that go into crafting both relationships. It's interesting to see how two very different types of sons from very distinct backgrounds ultimately share the similarity of a tense father-son relationship.
Hey Catalina, the father-son relationship that each family had I think summarizes a good number of father-son relationships in the real world as well. Often, children want to become just like their father, and it doesn't matter whether their father is a "good" father or bad father. It's really hard for a child to lave that mindset as Aneeka had to open Eamonn's eyes and the torture and killing of an innocent man had to open Parvaiz's.
ReplyDeleteHi Catalina! I think this is an awesome analysis of their relationships. I too thought it was interesting to see how the completely different relationships developed to similar messages. I think it was cool how Shamsie chose completely different ends of the relationship spectrums, but still had both fathers be absent in the son's lives.
ReplyDeleteHi Catalina! I think it's super interesting how you touch on how sons can often feel like they're supposed to become replicas of their fathers. Even after witnessing their shortcomings, they remain loyal to their idea of them. However, after Parvaiz completely emerges himself into his father's world, he understands that he was trying to emulate a fictional character. He had given his father more depth than he actually had.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with your sentiments around Shamise's portal of father son relationships. What I am now wondering is what her intent was in portraying them in this light? Was it simply an observation? Or maybe examples of extremes or what not to do? I'm also curious why this theme has such a grand presence in this novel and how it relates to our other themes.
ReplyDeleteThese are great questions, Griffin. What larger conclusions can we come to about what the book's position is on the effects of fathers on sons? In these two cases, the results are so harmful that it suggests she is more critical than not of the power that fathers have over sons--or the power that sons give their fathers over them... what do you think?
Delete